DB v 皇冠体育app Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and CE: [2024] UKUT 343 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus KC on 30 October 2024

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
27 November 2024
Categories:
Child support and Tribunal procedure and practice
Sub-categories:
Child support - variation/departure directions: other and Tribunal procedure and practice - tribunal jurisdiction
Judges:
Markus, K
Decision date:
30 October 2024

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

皇冠体育app parent with care sought a variation in response to an appeal against a child maintenance assessment by the non resident parent. 皇冠体育app First-tier Tribunal had not had power to direct the Secretary of State to make a decision under the Child Support Act 1991 but its direction could be treated as an invitation to the Secretary of State to consider the issue. 皇冠体育app tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the variation as a matter raised in the appeal.

Updates to this page

Published 27 November 2024