EAM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (UC): [2020] UKUT 247 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision of Judge Poynter on 7 August 2020.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
28 October 2020
Categories:
Universal Credit
Sub-categories:
Universal Credit - Housing
Judges:
Poynter, R
Decision date:
7 August 2020

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

Universal credit—other—capital—disregards—proceeds of sale of former home—whether the “reasonable certainty� test in R(IS) 7/01 remains good law following In re B (Children) [2008] UKHL 35. Universal credit—other—capital—disregards—proceeds of sale of former home—Universal Credit Regulations, Schedule 10, para.13(a)—meaning of “attributable to the proceeds of sale�. Universal credit—other—migration from existing benefits—whether “natural� migration from existing benefits gives rise to transitional protection from the universal credit capital limit.

Updates to this page

Published 28 October 2020