KW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2017] UKUT 54 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 31 January 2017.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
16 February 2017
Categories:
Personal independence payment 鈥� daily living activities and Personal independence payment 鈥� general
Sub-categories:
Personal independence payment 鈥� daily living activities - Activity 5: managing toilet needs or incontinence
Judges:
Poynter, R
Decision date:
31 January 2017

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

皇冠体育app Secretary of State accepts that a commode is an 鈥渁id鈥� to manage incontinence 皇冠体育app Secretary of State accepts that PIP is to be assessed with reference to the individual circumstances of the claimant

Updates to this page

Published 16 February 2017
Contents

Related content