MC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 27 August 2019.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
3 October 2019
Categories:
Personal independence payment � mobility activities
Sub-categories:
Personal independence payment � mobility activities - Mobility activity 1: planning and following journeys
Judges:
Hemingway, M
Decision date:
27 August 2019

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

When considering the ability to follow the route of a journey, is it permissible to limit consideration to only a short journey?

Updates to this page

Published 3 October 2019