S v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (UC): [2017] UKUT 477 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Mitchell on 3 December 2017.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
14 December 2017
Categories:
Universal Credit
Judges:
Mitchell, E
Decision date:
3 December 2017

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

In most cases, a failure to comply with a Universal Credit “work-related requirement� is sanctionable if done for “no good reason�. Does this mean the same as having ‘good cause� for doing or not doing something? Does it mean the same as ‘without good reason�? Answer to both questions: yes.

Updates to this page

Published 14 December 2017
Contents

Related content