Balance of Competences Review: Call for Evidence on Civil Judicial Cooperation
- From:
- Ministry of Justice and Foreign & Commonwealth Office
- Published
- 16 May 2013
- Last updated
- 13 February 2014 鈥� See all updates
Read the full outcome
PDF, 408 KB, 67 pages
PDF, 216 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 22.6 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 13.6 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 49.1 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 397 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 78.6 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 12.9 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 61.4 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 26.9 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 38.6 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 181 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 324 KB, 20 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 14.1 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 40.8 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 12.9 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 30.5 KB, 4 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 91.9 KB, 19 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 15.3 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 101 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 62.1 KB, 12 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 112 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 114 KB, 22 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 125 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 30.1 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 33.9 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 37.8 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 61.3 KB, 11 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 10.4 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 99.2 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 722 KB, 28 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 27.8 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 18.8 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 1.55 MB, 12 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 102 KB, 19 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 17.8 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 18.1 KB, 4 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 12.3 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
PDF, 1.08 MB, 23 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Detail of outcome
This report examines the balance of competences between the European Union and the United Kingdom in the area of civil judicial cooperation.
It is a reflection and analysis of the evidence submitted by experts, non-governmental organisations, businesspeople, Members of Parliament and other interested parties, either in writing or orally, as well as a literature review of relevant material.
Where appropriate, the report sets out the current position agreed within the Coalition Government for handling this policy area in the EU. It does not predetermine or prejudge proposals that either Coalition party may make in the future for changes to the EU or about the appropriate balance of competences.
Original call for evidence
Summary
皇冠体育app Government is carrying out an audit of what the EU does and how it affects the UK.
This call for evidence was held on .
This call for evidence ran from
to
Call for evidence description
皇冠体育app Balance of Competences Review was announced by the Foreign Secretary William Hague in July 2012 to examine the balance of competences between the UK and the European Union.
皇冠体育app Review is an audit of what the EU does, and how it affects government and the general public in the UK. This piece of work will deepen our understanding of EU membership, and help shape the UK鈥檚 policies in relation to the EU.
皇冠体育app Review led by the Ministry of Justice will examine the scope and nature of the EU鈥檚 power to act on matters of Civil Judicial Cooperation (including family matters).
皇冠体育app Ministry of Justice will also lead reports on:
- fundamental rights
- police and criminal justice (jointly with the Home Office)
and will contribute to a report on information rights, including data protection.
Read more about the Review of the Balance of Competences between the UK and the EU.
Documents
PDF, 158 KB, 34 pages
Share this page
皇冠体育app following links open in a new tab
Updates to this page
-
Consultation outcome and responses published.
-
First published.