Research and analysis

Independent Commission on Freedom of Information: call for evidence responses

This page provides public responses to the Independent Commission on Freedom of Information call for evidence.

From:
Independent Commission on Freedom of Information
Published
7 December 2015
Last updated
2 March 2016 鈥� See all updates

Documents

PDF, 1.79 MB, 183 pages

PDF, 1.73 MB, 172 pages

PDF, 1.5 MB, 161 pages

PDF, 1.85 MB, 146 pages

PDF, 1.35 MB, 139 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 7.85 MB, 31 pages

PDF, 1.9 MB, 404 pages

PDF, 524 KB, 21 pages

PDF, 1.45 MB, 212 pages

PDF, 1.67 MB, 219 pages

PDF, 960 KB, 127 pages

PDF, 646 KB, 93 pages

PDF, 137 KB, 7 pages

PDF, 730 KB, 34 pages

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 8.05 MB

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 6.69 MB

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 13.8 MB

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 10.2 MB

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 2.53 MB

Details

皇冠体育appse documents have been prepared by the Secretariat to the Independent Commission on Freedom of Information. 皇冠体育appy:

  • combine responses from organisations to the Commission鈥檚 call for evidence in alphabetical order
  • combine responses from organisations and individuals who submitted evidence via the online portal

In some cases, it has not been possible to include responses which have a significant number of annexes. For that reason, some responses are listed separately.

皇冠体育app Secretariat intends to update this page regularly.

Updates to this page

Published 7 December 2015
Last updated 2 March 2016 show all updates

  1. Added responses from Philip Coppel QC and Terence Ewing.

  2. Added more responses

  3. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page

Related content