BLM30210 - Taxation of leases that are not long funding leases: How tax advantages arise: timing differences - finance lessor, a worked example, part 2 of 4

In the example in BLM30040 the finance lessor is taxable (like the bank) on a profit of £20 at the end of the day, but the 25% capital allowances of £250 due to the lessor in Year 1 will create an upfront tax loss of £76. This is on a simplified calculation which assumes:

  • the total rentals of £1,200 are split evenly between the years
  • the ‘interestâ€� in and out is front-loaded
  • the ‘other expensesâ€� are slightly front-loaded
  • the asset is purchased at the start of Year 1.

This produces the following computation for the finance lessor for Year 1:

Entry Amount
Gross rents receivable (£1,200 ÷ 5) £240
Less interest payable £58
Gross profit £182
Less other expenses £8
Net profit £174
Less capital allowances £250
Tax loss (£76)

»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp loss is recovered later and the overall profit of £20 is taxed, as the following tax computations for the finance lessor for the whole five years shows:

Ìý Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Totals
Gross rent 240 240 240 240 240 1,200
Less interest payable 58 45 32 19 6 160
Gross profit 182 195 208 221 234 1,040
Less other expenses 8 4 4 4 0 20
Net profit 174 191 204 217 234 1,020
Less WDA and BA 250 188 141 105 317 1,000
Taxable profit (loss) (76) 4 64 112 (83) 20

»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp capital allowances for Year 5 assume a short-life election has been made and a balancing allowance is due on the worthless asset, thereby relieving the entire net cost over the 5 years.

With longer leases there are likely to be tax losses in the first few years. For example if the lease is over a 25-year term there could be tax losses in the first 6 or 7 years. Tax losses may be generated for longer periods by structuring the payment profile appropriately. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp longer the period of losses, and the greater the delay in recovering the tax, the greater the timing advantage.