CFM91835 - Debt cap: failure to make statements of allocation: default allocation of disallowance of financing expense amounts: DRICs: example
This guidance applies to worldwide group periods of account ending before or straddling 1 April 2017.
Example - default allocation where a group includes DRICs
A group has 7 relevant group companies which, in a particular period of account of the worldwide group, have net financing deductions. Two of these companies are dual resident investing companies (DRICs). »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp net financing deductions are as follows:
Companies that are not DRICs | NFD (£ million) | Companies that are DRICs | NFD (£ million) |
---|---|---|---|
Alpha Ltd | 82 | Psi Ltd | 100 |
Beta Ltd | 3 | Omega Ltd | 12 |
Gamma Ltd | 21 | - | - |
Delta Ltd | 19 | - | - |
Epsilon Ltd | 35 | - | - |
Total non-DRICs | 160 | - | - |
- | - | Total DRICs | 112 |
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp tested expense amount (TEA), which is the aggregate of the net financing deductions across all relevant group companies, is therefore £272 million. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp amount referred to as X in S284A, the aggregate net financing deduction for the DRICs, is £112 million.
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp group does not submit a statement of allocated disallowances, and a “default allocationâ€� is made.
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp following table shows how a disallowance would be allocated under S284 and S284A in two scenarios:
- if the total disallowed amount (TDA) is £60 million, and
- if the total disallowed amount is £180 million.
For a company that is not a DRIC, S284A (2) provides that the disallowance is calculated by applying the formula NFD/(TEA - X) x TDA.
Thus in the first scenario, the disallowance for each non-DRIC company will be:
NFD x 60/ (272 - 112), or NFD x 60/160
For a DRIC, S284A (3) provides the disallowance is NFD/X x (TDA - (TEA - X))
Inserting the figures for the first scenario (where the total disallowed amount is £60m) into this formula gives:
NFD/112 x (60 - (272 - 112))
Since this will always be negative, however, the disallowance for each DRIC is taken as nil.
In the second scenario, the disallowance for each non-DRIC would, under the S284A (2) formula, be:
NFD x 180/ (272 - 112)
This amount would, however, always be more than the company’s net financing deduction, so S284A (2) provides that the disallowance is limited to the company’s NFD.
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp amount to be allocated to each DRIC under S284A (3) will be:
NFD x (180 - (272 - 112)/112, or NFD x 20/112
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp overall result, in each scenario, will therefore be allocation of the full amount of the disallowance:
Company | NFD (£ million) | Disallowed amount if TDA = £60 million (£ million) | Disallowed amount if TDA = £180 million (£ million) |
---|---|---|---|
Alpha | 82 | (82 x 60/160) 30.75 | 82 |
Beta | 3 | 1.125 | 3 |
Gamma | 21 | 7.875 | 21 |
Delta | 19 | 7.125 | 19 |
Epsilon | 35 | 13.125 | 35 |
Psi | 100 | Nil | (100 x 20/112) = 17.857 |
Omega | 12 | Nil | 2.143 |
Totals | 272 | 60 | 180 |