CIRD61330 - Land Remediation Relief: What is “land in a contaminated state�?: Categorisation of risk
This section applies to expenditure incurred on or after 1 April 2009
»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp question is how the results of a risk assessment carried out as part of the planning process compare to the statutory definition of “relevant harmâ€� for Land Remediation Relief.
In some cases there are trigger thresholds such as soil guideline values (see CIRD61335). In other cases the developer will have to carry out a qualitative risk assessment.
Example:
A Ltd carries out a risk assessment and decides that there is a risk of harm to human health if they do not carry out appropriate remediation, but that if any harm were to occur it would probably be relatively mild.
A Ltd cannot claim Land Remediation Relief as the health implications are low.
Example:
B Ltd establishes that there is contamination present on the site. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýappy carry out a risk assessment which shows that harm is likely to be caused unless they take remedial action. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýappy also establish that the impact on human health would be severe enough that they would be unable to obtain planning permission for the proposed land use.
B Ltd can claim Land Remediation Relief as there is a high probability that the contamination would cause harm and that the harm would be severe enough to prevent re-use of the site.