»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp

This guidance applies to expenditure incurred on or after 1 April 2009.

CTA09/S1175

»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp question of whether a sub-contractor is connected to a company is to be determined in accordance with the provisions of ICTA88/S839.

If the company and the sub-contractor are connected persons then a payment is qualifying expenditure on sub-contracted land remediation only if certain conditions are met. If the conditions are met, then the qualifying expenditure on subcontracted land remediation is restricted to relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp conditions are:

• »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp principal must have paid the sub-contractor. Until the payment has been made, there is no “sub-contractor paymentâ€� for the purposes of Land Remediation Relief; and
• »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp sub-contractor must recognise the payment in its profit and loss account, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice; and
• »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp whole of the payment must be brought into account in determining the sub-contractor’s profit or loss for an accounting period that ends not more than twelve months after the accounting period of the contracting company in which the payment is an allowable deduction; and
• All of the sub-contractor’s relevant expenditure must be brought into account in determining the sub-contractor’s profit or loss for an accounting period that ends not more than twelve months after the accounting period of the contracting company in which the payment is an allowable deduction.

For these purposes any apportionment of the expenditure, of either the company or the subcontractor, is to be made on a just and reasonable basis.

For details of what is the relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor, see CIRD63245.