Promoting universal financial protection: health insurance for the poor in Georgia � a case study

Abstract

Background: »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp present study focuses on the program “Medical Insurance for the Poor (MIP)â€� in Georgia. Under this program, the government purchased coverage from private insurance companies for vulnerable households identified through a means testing system, targeting up to 23% of the total population. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp benefit package included outpatient and inpatient services with no co-payments, but had only limited outpatient drug benefits. This paper presents the results of the study on the impact of MIP on access to health services and financial protection of the MIP-targeted and general population.

Methods: With a holistic case study design, the study employed a range of quantitative and qualitative methods. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp methods included document review and secondary analysis of the data obtained through the nationwide household health expenditure and utilisation surveys 2007â€�2010 using the difference-in-differences method.

Results: »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp study findings showed that MIP had a positive impact in terms of reduced expenditure for inpatient services and total household health care costs, and there was a higher probability of receiving free outpatient benefits among the MIP-insured. However, MIP insurance had almost no effect on health services utilisation and the householdsâ€� expenditure on outpatient drugs, including for those with MIP insurance, due to limited drug benefits in the package and a low claims ratio. In summary, the extended MIP coverage and increased financial access provided by the program, most likely due to the exclusion of outpatient drug coverage from the benefit package and possibly due to improper utilisation management by private insurance companies, were not able to reverse adverse effects of economic slow-down and escalating health expenditure. MIP has only cushioned the negative impact for the poorest by decreasing the poor/rich gradient in the rates of catastrophic health expenditure.

Conclusions: »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp recent governmental decision on major expansion of MIP coverage and inclusion of additional drug benefit will most likely significantly enhance the overall MIP impact and its potential as a viable policy instrument for achieving universal coverage. »Ê¹ÚÌåÓýapp Georgian experience presented in this paper may be useful for other low- and middle-income countries that are contemplating ways to ensure universal coverage for their populations

Citation

Zoidze, A.; Rukhazde, N.; Chkhatarashvili, K.; Gotsadze, G. Promoting universal financial protection: health insurance for the poor in Georgia – a case study. Health Research Policy and Systems (2013) 11 (1) 45. [DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-45]

Updates to this page

Published 1 January 2013